September 30, 2013 E-mail to Code Enforcement about the owner of the commercial dumpster running a "Handyman" business out of his rental house. Day 14.

From:   Bev Beaufait <bbeaufa@beaufait.com>   

     [ add to contacts ]

 To:  Bruce Goodman <BruceB@louisvilleco.gov>
 Cc:  Council, City <CityCouncil@LouisvilleCO.gov>
 Date:  Monday, September 30, 2013 07:58 am
 Subject:  Day 14: Illegal Commercial Dumpster
Attachments:
 Text version of this message. (7KB)

City of Louisville Paid Public Servants:
 
It is day 14 for you folks allowing illegal activities by a recent renter to continue in our lovely neighborhood.
  
The owner of this vendor commercial dumpster has moved this construction dumpster a few times, cuz Code Enforcement made them leave.
 
They have other places to park this illegal commercial dumpster in our residential neighborhood.
 
What is the problem now? 
 
Are you just getting way tooooo much $$$$$$ to stop???  Obviously, in my neighborhood's humble opinion.
 
The renter's "Handyman" vendor truck did not show up this morning.  I bet Code Enforcement warned them.  Now do the remainder of the job, please and thanks.
 
Here are the pics from yesterday and today for my proofs.  Please check daily for updates.
 
 
The lying Police Chief sent me this e-mail in May, 2012 stating "tagging before removal" of illegally parked/stored commercial vehicles in a residential neighborhood.  The Police Chief had the vehicle removed over and over again for about 1 year.  How corrupt can it get? 
 
Here is that specific e-mail.
 
  
Then our lying Police Chief gives out another City Code (that he makes up; e-mail below) ,and he claims it makes it, so he does not follow the residential parking laws in his lying, corrupt, uncivil e-mails to me. 
 
I have received more than 1 lying, corrupt, uncivil e-mail from our illustrious Chief of Police for months on end, just like this one. 
 
 
Then the Police Chief sent me another lying, corrupt, uncivil e-mail telling me he will look into the matter.
 
 
These matters have been looked into since May, 2013, when I first reported this illegal activity with the commercial vendor dumpster. 
 
No tagging has been done.  Nothing has been done, but fluff and buff drive bys.
 
Why?
 
Because our Police Chief, in his forever job, is backed into a corner by trying to defend himself with his lies and non actions.
 
He will not admit he is wrong.  He has no backbone.
 
A good person would admit to their mistakes and correct the situation.
  
But, because our Chief of Police is a such a horrible pathological liar, in my humble opinion, he has dug his heels into the ground for an all out battle with me.  Frightening to say the least!
 
He is a very confused man, in my humble opinion.  A sicko, in my humble opinion.
 
I have to swear an oath that I am not holding grudges, when I get "verified statements" notarized against the Police Chief to prove his illegal activities.
 
But our Police Chief can hold grudges against me for over 1 year now and get away with illegal actions without any worry about being jailed for lying.
 
This town is so very, very evil and corrupt.
 
"This town needs an enema!"  This statement is from "The Joker" in an old Batman movie.

The Police Chief needs to be fired on the spot for his lies for degrading our neighborhood for too many months on end now, in my humble opinion.
 
Here is our law that shows our Chief of Police should be arrested and held accountable for his non reality based Police decisions.  He knowingly disobeys our City Municode Parking Laws on the books. 
 

Sec. 9.04.050. Disobeying a lawful order.permanent
                                            link to this piece of
                                            content

It is unlawful for any person to knowingly disobey the lawful order of any police officer, firefighter, or emergency personnel giving incident to the discharge of the official duties of such police officer or firefighter.

(Code 1977, § 9.04.050; Ord. No. 748-1981, § 4)

 


 
Don't worry! 
 
I will be informing you folks, daily, of the illegal parking/storing of illegal commercial dumpsters in our neighborhood, until this matter is finally cleared up.
 
We, citizens in our City, expect our taxpayer $$$$ to be well spent, and not to be spent on useless, lazy employees that will not do their job.
 
City Council!  Be brave!  I continue with daily prayers for all to do the right thing for our City.
 
Sincerely,
 
Bev Beaufait
 
P.S.

Sec. 10.20.040. Oversized commercial vehicles.permanent link to
                                              this piece of content

An oversized commercial vehicle, defined as any vehicle registered, licensed or used for commercial purposes or displaying advertisements for commercial enterprise and exceeding 18 feet in length, 18 feet in combined length for vehicles with trailers, or eight feet in height, or 8,000 pounds in weight by the G.V.W. rating indicated on vehicle, loaded or unloaded, shall be prohibited from all zoning districts except with the following exceptions: I-Industrial.

A.

Oversized commercial vehicles incidental to a commercial enterprise shall be permitted on the premises of such commercial enterprise in C-C, C-B, C-N, zoning.

B.

Loading or unloading of moving vans or similar type vehicles used for moving of personal goods for a period of 24 hours or less.

C.

Temporary parking for pickup and delivery purposes for a period of four hours or less.

D.

Construction equipment and/or machinery employed in any public works project in the city parked at the site of and for the duration of such construction.

(Code 1977, § 10.20.040; Ord. No. 748-1981, § 5)

 
 
Chapter 17.20 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING [1] 
Sec. 17.20.160. Motor vehicle parking limitations.permanent link to
                                                  this piece of content

 

B.  On residential lots, no more than two motor vehicles may be parked on any area of the lot other than within a fully enclosed structure or on the paved driveway which is intended for parking or access to the garage or carport. A motor vehicle which is parked or stored on an improved surface adjacent to a paved driveway, or in a rear yard, a side yard, or a side yard adjacent to the street shall be counted towards the limit of two such vehicles. No more than one such motor vehicle may be an inoperable vehicle as defined in section 8.16.040.D.1 of this Code.



Sec. 17.20.100. - Parking spaces not to be used for storage or advertising. Required parking spaces shall be available for the parking of operable passenger automobiles of residents, customers, patrons, and employees only, and shall not be used for the storage of vehicles or materials or for the parking of trucks used in conducting the business or use, or for the purpose of advertising.(Code 1977, § 17.20.100; Ord. No. 715-1981, § 15) 


This is from our Ethics Code

"Open Government & Ethics Pamphlet 2013
Other Ethics Rules of Interest 
Page 7

It also prohibits acts of advantage or favoritism and, in that regard, prohibits special considerations, use of employee time for personal or private 
reasons, and use of City vehicles or equipment, except in same manner as available to any other person (or in manner that will substantially benefit City)."


"Last night we heard from the owners of the truck.  It belongs to a couple who recently moved to Louisville and who just purchased the vehicle.  The husband and wife are a little distressed about why the selective enforcement against them.  Commander Kingston will speak with them and convey our assurances that this is all quite routine and innocent. "

This quote is from a May 25, 2012 e-mail to me from Bruce Goodman, Police Chief.  He knows the rules.  He applies them when he wants.  He is a bully.  He does not do his job that he is paid to do.  He should be fired on the spot.  If he did his job correctly, the first time he contacted the owners, he would not be  backed into a corner to save face.  Now, he will not do his job, just to try to prove he is correct, when he is so very wrong.