Here are the pics
from today for my proofs. Updates
will come daily until this is cleared
up.
The lying Police
Chief sent me this e-mail
in May, 2012 stating "tagging
before removal" of illegally
parked/stored commercial vehicles in a
residential neighborhood. The
Police Chief had the vehicle removed
over and over again for about 1
year. How corrupt can it
get?
Here is that specific e-mail.
Then our lying
Police Chief gives out another
City Code (that he makes up; e-mail
below) ,and he claims it makes it,
so he does not follow the residential
parking laws in his lying, corrupt,
uncivil e-mails to me.
I have received more than 1
lying, corrupt, uncivil e-mail from
our illustrious Chief of Police for
months on end, just like this one.
Then the
Police Chief sent me another lying,
corrupt, uncivil e-mail telling me
he will look into the matter.
Sincerely,
Bev Beaufait
P.S.
Sec. 10.20.040. Oversized commercial vehicles.
An
oversized commercial
vehicle, defined as any
vehicle registered,
licensed or used for
commercial purposes or
displaying advertisements
for commercial enterprise
and exceeding 18 feet in
length, 18 feet in
combined length for
vehicles with trailers, or
eight feet in height, or
8,000 pounds in weight by
the G.V.W. rating
indicated on vehicle,
loaded or unloaded, shall
be prohibited from all
zoning districts except
with the following
exceptions: I-Industrial.
A.
Oversized commercial
vehicles incidental to a
commercial enterprise
shall be permitted on the
premises of such
commercial enterprise in
C-C, C-B, C-N, zoning.
B.
Loading or unloading
of moving vans or similar
type vehicles used for
moving of personal goods
for a period of 24 hours
or less.
C.
Temporary parking
for pickup and delivery
purposes for a period of
four hours or less.
D.
Construction
equipment and/or machinery
employed in any public
works project in the city
parked at the site of and
for the duration of such
construction.
(Code
1977, § 10.20.040; Ord.
No. 748-1981, § 5)
Chapter
17.20 OFF-STREET
PARKING AND
LOADING [1]
Sec.
17.20.160. Motor
vehicle parking
limitations.
B. On residential lots,
no more than two
motor vehicles may
be parked on any
area of the lot
other than within
a fully enclosed
structure or on
the paved driveway
which is intended
for parking or
access to the
garage or carport.
A motor vehicle
which is parked or
stored on an
improved surface
adjacent to a
paved driveway, or
in a rear yard, a
side yard, or a
side yard adjacent
to the street
shall be counted
towards the limit
of two such
vehicles. No more
than one such
motor vehicle may
be an inoperable
vehicle as defined
in section
8.16.040.D.1 of
this Code.
Sec. 17.20.100.
- Parking spaces
not to be used for
storage or
advertising. Required parking spaces
shall be available for
the parking of
operable passenger
automobiles of
residents, customers,
patrons, and employees
only, and shall not be
used for the storage of
vehicles or materials or
for the parking of
trucks used in
conducting the business
or use, or for the
purpose of advertising.(Code
1977, § 17.20.100;
Ord. No. 715-1981, §
15)
This is from our
Ethics Code
"Open Government &
Ethics Pamphlet 2013
Other Ethics Rules of
Interest
Page 7
It also prohibits
acts of advantage or
favoritism and, in that
regard, prohibits
special considerations,
use of employee time for
personal or private
reasons, and use
of City vehicles or
equipment, except in
same manner as available
to any other person (or
in manner that will
substantially benefit
City)."
"Last night we heard from the owners of the truck.
It belongs to
a couple who
recently moved
to Louisville
and who just
purchased the
vehicle.
The husband
and wife are a
little
distressed
about why the
selective
enforcement
against
them.
Commander
Kingston will
speak with
them and
convey our
assurances
that this is
all quite
routine and
innocent. "
This
quote is from
a May 25, 2012
e-mail to me
from Bruce
Goodman,
Police
Chief.
He knows the
rules.
He applies
them when he
wants.
He is a
bully.
He does not do
his job that
he is paid to
do. He
should be
fired on the
spot. If
he did his job
correctly, the
first time he
contacted the
owners, he
would not
be
backed into a
corner to save
face.
Now, he will
not do his
job, just to
try to prove
he is correct,
when he is so
very wrong.
|
|