October 11, 2013 E-mail From The Mayor Trying To Lie His Way Out Of The Illegal Commercial Vendor's Illegal Business In Our Neighborhood.

From:   Robert Muckle <bobm@Louisvilleco.gov>   

     [ add to contacts ]

 To:  Bev Beaufait <bbeaufa@beaufait.com>
 Date:  Friday, October 11, 2013 10:17 am
 Subject:  Re: Day 25 Illegal Commercial Dumpster
 Text version of this message. (8KB)

It would help address your concern if you just gave the address in question. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:22 AM, "Bev Beaufait" <bbeaufa@beaufait.com> wrote:

City Council, 
You try to baffle me with your BS in your e-mails to me, rather than try to dazzle me with your brilliance in your e-mails to me with the illegal commercial business that you are allowing the Police Chief to also illegally allow in our residential neighborhood. 
So, therefore, I do not read e-mails from City Council any more, per my legal advice.  
Those e-mails are uncivil and evil and do nothing to fix the illegal activities that the Police Chief allows, and you allow the Police Chief to do.
You folks seem to think that the Police Chief is some sort of a demi-god that speaks and does no evil.
I have presented over 1.5 years of proofs of illegal activities of our Police Chief. 
It is enough for you folks, as private citizens of Louisville, to put in your own "verified statements" against our Police Chief for showing favoritism, which is against our City Code, as you well know.
Louisville's Police Chief acts like John Boehner.  He lies.   He changes his stories to try to suit his own circumstances.
Surely, you folks on City Council can see his disassociation from reality, because he follows the City Code laws, when he wants.
City Council could always change the laws to make the Police Chief look less psychotic, in my humble opinion.
But then it would prove that I was right about our laws being correct laws and not "pretend laws" that our illogical Police Chief "sees/interprets".
You are between a rock and a hard place.
You don't want to admit you are wrong.
I have lost all respect for City Council. 
Strong people admit their faults.
Weak people continue with lies and false beliefs, because they cannot handle the truth.
City Council is very, very weak.
Our Police Chief is also like Ted Cruz.  He leads you folks to believe in his battles, and then leaves you folks to pick up the pieces, believe his lies, and do his "dirty work", in my humble opinion.
I will continue to report illegal activities that are allowed on our residential neighborhood by our criminally minded Police Chief, who has no morals to back down and admit he is wrong.
It is because I am a woman.
Men truly dislike being shown they are wrong by women that they obviously despise, which is totally mental, in my humble opinion.
Per my legal advice, I am saving all uncivil, illogical e-mails from the Police Chief and City Council as evidence for a case of harassment to me by you folks, rather than doing your jobs.
If you don't like your jobs, quit.  Let somebody else with the gumption to see the truths, when put straight in front of them, to get rid of the corruption in the town from the Police Department and obviously within City Council, itself.
I am beginning to think that you cannot comprehend what I am saying in my e-mails to you.  I think it goes over your heads.   
I will continue to send you proofs daily, until you either remove the illegal activity in our neighborhood by a renter running a commercial business out of a rental house, or you remove the troublemaker, our Police Chief, through "verified statements" with my picture proofs for over 1.5 years for your "true statements and not statements that hold grudges", like our Police Chief does with me.
Here are the pics from today for my proofs.  Updates will come daily until this is cleared up.
The lying Police Chief sent me this e-mail in May, 2012 stating "tagging before removal" of illegally parked/stored commercial vehicles in a residential neighborhood.  The Police Chief had the vehicle removed over and over again for about 1 year.  How corrupt can it get? 
Here is that specific e-mail.
Then our lying Police Chief gives out another City Code (that he makes up; e-mail below) ,and he claims it makes it, so he does not follow the residential parking laws in his lying, corrupt, uncivil e-mails to me. 
I have received more than 1 lying, corrupt, uncivil e-mail from our illustrious Chief of Police for months on end, just like this one. 
Then the Police Chief sent me another lying, corrupt, uncivil e-mail telling me he will look into the matter.
Bev Beaufait

Sec. 9.04.050. Disobeying a lawful order.permanent
                                                        link to this
                                                        piece of

It is unlawful for any person to knowingly disobey the lawful order of any police officer, firefighter, or emergency personnel giving incident to the discharge of the official duties of such police officer or firefighter.

(Code 1977, § 9.04.050; Ord. No. 748-1981, § 4)


Sec. 10.20.040. Oversized commercial vehicles.permanent
                                                      link to this piece
                                                      of content

An oversized commercial vehicle, defined as any vehicle registered, licensed or used for commercial purposes or displaying advertisements for commercial enterprise and exceeding 18 feet in length, 18 feet in combined length for vehicles with trailers, or eight feet in height, or 8,000 pounds in weight by the G.V.W. rating indicated on vehicle, loaded or unloaded, shall be prohibited from all zoning districts except with the following exceptions: I-Industrial.


Oversized commercial vehicles incidental to a commercial enterprise shall be permitted on the premises of such commercial enterprise in C-C, C-B, C-N, zoning.


Loading or unloading of moving vans or similar type vehicles used for moving of personal goods for a period of 24 hours or less.


Temporary parking for pickup and delivery purposes for a period of four hours or less.


Construction equipment and/or machinery employed in any public works project in the city parked at the site of and for the duration of such construction.

(Code 1977, § 10.20.040; Ord. No. 748-1981, § 5)

Sec. 17.20.160. Motor vehicle parking limitations.permanent
                                                          link to this
                                                          piece of


B.  On residential lots, no more than two motor vehicles may be parked on any area of the lot other than within a fully enclosed structure or on the paved driveway which is intended for parking or access to the garage or carport. A motor vehicle which is parked or stored on an improved surface adjacent to a paved driveway, or in a rear yard, a side yard, or a side yard adjacent to the street shall be counted towards the limit of two such vehicles. No more than one such motor vehicle may be an inoperable vehicle as defined in section 8.16.040.D.1 of this Code.

Sec. 17.20.100. - Parking spaces not to be used for storage or advertising. Required parking spaces shall be available for the parking of operable passenger automobiles of residents, customers, patrons, and employees only, and shall not be used for the storage of vehicles or materials or for the parking of trucks used in conducting the business or use, or for the purpose of advertising.(Code 1977, § 17.20.100; Ord. No. 715-1981, § 15) 

This is from our Ethics Code

"Open Government & Ethics Pamphlet 2013
Other Ethics Rules of Interest 
Page 7

It also prohibits acts of advantage or favoritism and, in that regard, prohibits special considerations, use of employee time for personal or private 
reasons, and use of City vehicles or equipment, except in same manner as available to any other person (or in manner that will substantially benefit City)."

"Last night we heard from the owners of the truck.  It belongs to a couple who recently moved to Louisville and who just purchased the vehicle.  The husband and wife are a little distressed about why the selective enforcement against them.  Commander Kingston will speak with them and convey our assurances that this is all quite routine and innocent. "

This quote is from a May 25, 2012 e-mail to me from Bruce Goodman, Police Chief.  He knows the rules.  He applies them when he wants.  He is a bully.  He does not do his job that he is paid to do.  He should be fired on the spot.  If he did his job correctly, the first time he contacted the owners, he would not be  backed into a corner to save face.  Now, he will not do his job, just to try to prove he is correct, when he is so very wrong.