Day
30. Still there.
Current updates are available at
the URL address listed below.
I put in 2
"verified statements" to the
Prosecuting Attorney this morning
at the cop station against 2 City
Council folks, as they will not do
their job and need to be removed
from office immediately, never to
hold public office again.
They allow
the publicly corrupt Police Chief
to allow illegal commercial vendor
businesses to be operated in a
residential neighborhood against
our City Code laws SINCE
MAY!!!!!!!
AGAIN, The
address is 409 W. Sycamore Court.
Get rid of
this illegal business in our
residential neighborhood now.
You folks
have had more than enough time to
do your jobs. You obviously
hate your work very much, as you
do such a bad job at it.
Corruption
is rampant in CO!!!!!!!
I will
be reporting this situation
to Channel 7 News, as they are
investigating Berthoud, they can
investigate Louisville, too.
I am sure they will
be interested in 4 "verified statements"
against the upper echelon of the power
structure in Louisville.
From our Municode
Sec. 17.12.010. District categories.
4. Residential low
density R-L. The
residential low density R-L
district is comprised of typical
urban density single-family
residential areas.
7. Commercial
neighborhood C-N. The
commercial neighborhood C-N
district is comprised of areas
to accommodate mixed residential
and commercial uses. Uses in
this district shall be strictly
reviewed to ensure
compatibility.
8.
Commercial community
C-C. The
commercial community C-C is a
district comprised of areas to
provide for a restricted range
of retail sales and services
including opportunities for a
limited variety of comparative
shoppers' goods.
9.
Commercial business
C-B. The
commercial business C-B is a
district comprised of areas to
provide for a full range of
retail sales and services
including opportunities for a
complete variety of comparative
shoppers' goods.
Our
neighborhood is number 4.
ONLY!!!!
Our
neighborhood is not numbers 7 -9.
The
renter's customers' garbage is
stored illegally in this illegal
commercial vendor dumpster in
their rental driveway for weeks now
running an illegal
vendor business out of a
residential neighborhood.
Here are the dates
that Code Enforcement has already
removed this commercial vendor
dumpster doing illegal vendor
business in a residential
neighborhood.
May 23 - May 28
June 24 -
27
August
10 - 11
August 31 - September 4
I sent e-mails
proving this renter is allowed
by Code Enforcement to break our
residential laws of not allowing
vendor commercial businesses in our
neighborhood. It is immaterial
of the size of the commercial
dumpsters, trucks, etc. that are
used.
The point is that it
is illegal to run commercial vendor
businesses out of residential
neighborhoods in our City, and City
Council and Code Enforcement knows
it also.
Code Enforcement had the renter
owner of this commercial dumpster
move their commercial dumpster these
4 dates above.
Code Enforcement can have this
illegal commercial dumpster business
stop in a residential neighborhood.
If Code Enforcement did it in the
past, they can do it now.
Why is this commercial vehicle
being allowed to stay in our
neighborhood now?
I have painted
a picture for you with
pretty water colors to refresh
your memory for our residential
codes for no commercial businesses
allowed in our neighborhood ever.
I have held up a
mirror for you folks to see your
illegal, publically corrupt ways.
Do you get
it?
City Council allows
Code Enforcement to break our
residential laws for
favoritism. It is also against
our ethics code for public
servants...you folks.
September
17 - October 11
This
is how long City Council has
allowed Code Enforcement to
break our residential laws for
favoritism. It is also
against our ethics code for
public servants...you folks.
I
am sure City Council and Code
Enforcement chooses to ignore
this district category
law. So utterly shameful
and completely disgusting
behavior.
Public
corruption is rampant in our
town, because City Council
allows it.
I
have any e-mails from you folks
forwarded straight to my legal
council, because I know they
will be uncivil and full of
lies.
I
don't need e-mails from you
folks.
I
just walk to the corner each
morning to take a pic.
If
nothing has changed, no e-mail
full of evil lies from City
Council/Code Enforcement will
change the illegal activities
this publically corrupt City
Council allows.
Here
are the pics from today
for my proofs.
Updates will come daily
until this is cleared
up.
The lying
Police
Chief sent me this
e-mail in May,
2012 stating
"tagging before removal"
of illegally
parked/stored commercial
vehicles in a
residential
neighborhood. The
Police Chief had the
vehicle removed over and
over again for about 1
year. How corrupt
can it get?
Here is that
specific e-mail.
Then our
lying
Police Chief gives
out another City Code
(that he makes up;
e-mail below) ,and he
claims it makes it,
so he does not follow
the residential parking
laws in his lying,
corrupt, uncivil e-mails
to me.
I have received
more than 1 lying,
corrupt,
uncivil e-mail from
our illustrious Chief of
Police for months on
end, just like this
one.
Then the
Police Chief sent
me another lying,
corrupt,
uncivil e-mail
telling me he will look
into the matter.
Sincerely,
Bev
Beaufait
P.S.
Sec.
9.04.050. Disobeying
a lawful
order.
It is unlawful for any person to knowingly disobey the
lawful order
of any police
officer,
firefighter,
or emergency
personnel
giving
incident to
the discharge
of the
official
duties of such
police officer
or
firefighter.
(Code 1977, § 9.04.050; Ord. No. 748-1981, § 4)
Sec.
10.20.040. Oversized commercial vehicles.
An
oversized
commercial
vehicle,
defined as any
vehicle
registered,
licensed or
used for
commercial
purposes or
displaying
advertisements
for commercial
enterprise and
exceeding 18
feet in
length, 18
feet in
combined
length for
vehicles with
trailers, or
eight feet in
height, or
8,000 pounds
in weight by
the G.V.W.
rating
indicated on
vehicle,
loaded or
unloaded,
shall be
prohibited
from all
zoning
districts
except with
the following
exceptions:
I-Industrial.
Oversized
commercial
vehicles
incidental to
a commercial
enterprise
shall be
permitted on
the premises
of such
commercial
enterprise in
C-C, C-B, C-N,
zoning.
Loading
or unloading
of moving vans
or similar
type vehicles
used for
moving of
personal goods
for a period
of 24 hours or
less.
Temporary
parking for
pickup and
delivery
purposes for a
period of four
hours or less.
Construction
equipment
and/or
machinery
employed in
any public
works project
in the city
parked at the
site of and
for the
duration of
such
construction.
(Code
1977, §
10.20.040;
Ord. No.
748-1981, § 5)
Chapter
17.20 OFF-STREET
PARKING AND
LOADING [1]
Sec.
17.20.160. Motor
vehicle
parking
limitations.
B. On residential lots,
no more than
two motor
vehicles may
be parked on
any area of
the lot other
than within a
fully enclosed
structure or
on the paved
driveway which
is intended
for parking or
access to the
garage or
carport. A
motor vehicle
which is
parked or
stored on an
improved
surface
adjacent to a
paved
driveway, or
in a rear
yard, a side
yard, or a
side yard
adjacent to
the street
shall be
counted
towards the
limit of two
such vehicles.
No more than
one such motor
vehicle may be
an inoperable
vehicle as
defined in
section
8.16.040.D.1
of this Code.
Sec.
17.20.100. - Parking spaces
not to be used
for storage or
advertising. Required parking spaces
shall be
available for
the parking of
operable
passenger
automobiles of
residents,
customers,
patrons, and
employees
only, and
shall not be
used for the
storage of
vehicles or
materials or
for the parking of
trucks used in
conducting the
business or
use, or for
the purpose of
advertising.(Code
1977, §
17.20.100;
Ord. No.
715-1981, §
15)
This is
from our
Ethics Code
"Open
Government
& Ethics
Pamphlet 2013
Other Ethics
Rules of
Interest
Page 7
It also
prohibits acts
of advantage
or favoritism
and, in that
regard,
prohibits
special
considerations,
use of
employee time
for personal
or private
reasons,
and use of
City vehicles
or equipment,
except in same
manner as
available to
any other
person (or in
manner that
will
substantially
benefit
City)."
"Last night we heard from the owners of the truck.
It belongs to
a couple who
recently moved
to Louisville
and who just
purchased the
vehicle.
The husband
and wife are a
little
distressed
about why the
selective
enforcement
against
them.
Commander
Kingston will
speak with
them and
convey our
assurances
that this is
all quite
routine and
innocent. "
This
quote is from
a May 25, 2012
e-mail to me
from Bruce
Goodman,
Police
Chief.
He knows the
rules.
He applies
them when he
wants.
He is a
bully.
He does not do
his job that
he is paid to
do. He
should be
fired on the
spot. If
he did his job
correctly, the
first time he
contacted the
owners, he
would not
be
backed into a
corner to save
face.
Now, he will
not do his
job, just to
try to prove
he is correct,
when he is so
very wrong.
|
|
Text version of this
message. (10KB) 
dumpster1016.JPG (72KB)