From: |
Robert
Muckle
<bobm@Louisvilleco.gov>
|
|
[ add to
contacts ]
|
To: |
Bev
Beaufait <bbeaufa@beaufait.com> |
Cc: |
|
Date: |
Thursday, October 10, 2013 04:19 pm |
Subject: |
Re: Day 24 Illegal
Commercial Dumpster Business |
Attachments: |
|
Ms.
Beaufait:
What is the address of the home you
are concerned about?
Bob Muckle
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2013, at 3:47 PM, "Bev
Beaufait"
<bbeaufa@beaufait.com> wrote:
> City Council,
>
> Day 24. Still there. The
"Handyman" commercial vendor company
that these renters run illegally out
of their rental home has come back
for supplies, again, today, for the
3rd time. It is the white truck with
the red light on the back near the
ladder on top. There is a very good
pic of the truck in the 9-28 pic.
This is not a commercial
neighborhood. This is against the
law. Stop taking $$$$ for them to
run this illegal business out of
their rental home.
>
> You people are useless. You
have not control of this City. You
people are the devil in disguise for
taking $$$$ from "lobbyists renter
vendors" to allow them to continue
this illegal business in our
neighborhood.
>
> Everybody knows this is
illegal. What is the matter with you
folks, anyway? Are you paralyzed in
fear of the Police Chief, who is
useless and wasting taxpayer $$$ in
his position in our City.
>
> Please get rid of him. NOW!!!!!
>
> The 3 pics from today are
attachments above. Fix this
immediately.
>
> How would you like the Police
Chief to do this to your
neighborhood, just cuz he hates you
the way he hates me for proving him
wrong day after day...for weeks on
end now.
>
> This is the Mr. Rooter
situation all over again that was
eventually resolved, as it is
against the law to run vendor
commercial businesses in a
residential neighborhood.
>
> Everybody knows this.
>
> Focus.
>
>
>
________________________________
>
>
>
> Early this morning this
"Handyman" vendor commercial company
dropped off their customers' garbage
into their illegally stored
commercial vendor dumpster in their
driveway, of their rental house,
that is allowed by the illegal
Police Department, which the illegal
City Council allows, by the actions
of you people, as proof.
>
> It has been very noisy with
these trucks coming and going all
morning running their vendor
"Handyman" commercial business in a
residential neighborhood, by storing
their customers' garbage in the back
of their covered truck on W. Elm St.
so no one would see it, too.
>
> But I got 2 pics of both
actions.
>
> What is wrong with this
scenerio, people?????
>
> Get a grip, people.
>
> Here are the pics from today
for my proofs. Updates will come
daily until this is cleared up.
>
> http://www.beaufait.com/dumpster1.html
>
________________________________
>
> The lying Police Chief sent me
this e-mail in May, 2012 stating
"tagging before removal" of
illegally parked/stored commercial
vehicles in a residential
neighborhood. The Police Chief had
the vehicle removed over and over
again for about 1 year. How corrupt
can it get?
>
> Here is that specific e-mail.
>
> http://www.beaufait.com/email6.html
>
________________________________
>
> Then our lying Police Chief
gives out another City Code (that he
makes up; e-mail below) ,and he
claims it makes it, so he does not
follow the residential parking laws
in his lying, corrupt, uncivil
e-mails to me.
>
> I have received more than 1
lying, corrupt, uncivil e-mail from
our illustrious Chief of Police for
months on end, just like this one.
>
> http://www.beaufait.com/emailb.html
>
________________________________
>
> Then the Police Chief sent me
another lying, corrupt, uncivil
e-mail telling me he will look into
the matter.
>
> http://www.beaufait.com/email43.html
>
________________________________
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Bev Beaufait
> P.S.
>
> Sec. 9.04.050. Disobeying a
lawful order.[permanent link to this
piece of content]
>
> It is unlawful for any person
to knowingly disobey the lawful
order of any police officer,
firefighter, or emergency personnel
giving incident to the discharge of
the official duties of such police
officer or firefighter.
>
> (Code 1977, § 9.04.050; Ord.
No. 748-1981, § 4)
>
>
>
>
>
> Sec. 10.20.040. Oversized
commercial vehicles.[permanent link
to this piece of content]
>
> An oversized commercial
vehicle, defined as any vehicle
registered, licensed or used for
commercial purposes or displaying
advertisements for commercial
enterprise and exceeding 18 feet in
length, 18 feet in combined length
for vehicles with trailers, or eight
feet in height, or 8,000 pounds in
weight by the G.V.W. rating
indicated on vehicle, loaded or
unloaded, shall be prohibited from
all zoning districts except with the
following exceptions: I-Industrial.
>
> A.
>
> Oversized commercial vehicles
incidental to a commercial
enterprise shall be permitted on the
premises of such commercial
enterprise in C-C, C-B, C-N, zoning.
>
> B.
>
> Loading or unloading of moving
vans or similar type vehicles used
for moving of personal goods for a
period of 24 hours or less.
>
> C.
>
> Temporary parking for pickup
and delivery purposes for a period
of four hours or less.
>
> D.
>
> Construction equipment and/or
machinery employed in any public
works project in the city parked at
the site of and for the duration of
such construction.
>
> (Code 1977, § 10.20.040; Ord.
No. 748-1981, § 5)
>
>
>
> Chapter 17.20 OFF-STREET
PARKING AND LOADING [1]<http://library.municode.com/HTML/13149/level2/TIT17ZO_CH17.20OREPALO.html#fn_97>
> Sec. 17.20.160. Motor vehicle
parking limitations.[permanent link
to this piece of content]
>
> B. On residential lots, no more
than two motor vehicles may be
parked on any area of the lot other
than within a fully enclosed
structure or on the paved driveway
which is intended for parking or
access to the garage or carport. A
motor vehicle which is parked or
stored on an improved surface
adjacent to a paved driveway, or in
a rear yard, a side yard, or a side
yard adjacent to the street shall be
counted towards the limit of two
such vehicles. No more than one such
motor vehicle may be an inoperable
vehicle as defined in section
8.16.040.D.1 of this Code.
>
________________________________
>
> Sec. 17.20.100. - <http://mail.beaufait.com/edgedesk/cgi-bin/>
Parking<http://mail.beaufait.com/edgedesk/cgi-bin/>
spaces not to be used for storage or
advertising. Required parking spaces
shall be available for the parking
of operable passenger automobiles of
residents, customers, patrons, and
employees only, and shall not be
used for the storage of vehicles or
materials or for the parking of
trucks used in conducting the
business or use, or for the purpose
of advertising.(Code 1977, §
17.20.100; Ord. No. 715-1981, § 15)
>
________________________________
> This is from our Ethics Code
>
> "Open Government & Ethics
Pamphlet 2013
> Other Ethics Rules of Interest
> Page 7
> It also prohibits acts of
advantage or favoritism and, in that
regard, prohibits special
considerations, use of employee time
for personal or private
> reasons, and use of City
vehicles or equipment, except in
same manner as available to any
other person (or in manner that will
substantially benefit City)."
>
________________________________
>
> "Last night we heard from the
owners of the truck. It belongs to a
couple who recently moved to
Louisville and who just purchased
the vehicle. The husband and wife
are a little distressed about why
the selective enforcement against
them. Commander Kingston will speak
with them and convey our assurances
that this is all quite routine and
innocent. "
>
> This quote is from a May 25,
2012 e-mail to me from Bruce
Goodman, Police Chief. He knows the
rules. He applies them when he
wants. He is a bully. He does not do
his job that he is paid to do. He
should be fired on the spot. If he
did his job correctly, the first
time he contacted the owners, he
would not be backed into a corner to
save face. Now, he will not do his
job, just to try to prove he is
correct, when he is so very wrong.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Early this morning this
"Handyman" vendor commercial company
dropped off their customers' garbage
into their illegally stored
commercial vendor dumpster in their
driveway, of their rental house,
that is allowed by the illegal
Police Department, which the illegal
City Council allows, by the actions
of you people, as proof.
>
> It has been very noisy with
these trucks coming and going all
morning running their vendor
"Handyman" commercial business in a
residential neighborhood, by storing
their customers' garbage in the back
of their covered truck on W. Elm St.
so no one would see it, too.
>
> But I got 2 pics of both
actions.
>
> What is wrong with this
scenerio, people?????
>
> Get a grip, people.
>
> Here are the pics from today
for my proofs. Updates will come
daily until this is cleared up.
>
> http://www.beaufait.com/dumpster1.html
>
________________________________
>
> The lying Police Chief sent me
this e-mail in May, 2012 stating
"tagging before removal" of
illegally parked/stored commercial
vehicles in a residential
neighborhood. The Police Chief had
the vehicle removed over and over
again for about 1 year. How corrupt
can it get?
>
> Here is that specific e-mail.
>
> http://www.beaufait.com/email6.html
>
________________________________
>
> Then our lying Police Chief
gives out another City Code (that he
makes up; e-mail below) ,and he
claims it makes it, so he does not
follow the residential parking laws
in his lying, corrupt, uncivil
e-mails to me.
>
> I have received more than 1
lying, corrupt, uncivil e-mail from
our illustrious Chief of Police for
months on end, just like this one.
>
> http://www.beaufait.com/emailb.html
>
________________________________
>
> Then the Police Chief sent me
another lying, corrupt, uncivil
e-mail telling me he will look into
the matter.
>
> http://www.beaufait.com/email43.html
>
________________________________
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Bev Beaufait
> P.S.
>
> Sec. 9.04.050. Disobeying a
lawful order.[permanent link to this
piece of content]
>
> It is unlawful for any person
to knowingly disobey the lawful
order of any police officer,
firefighter, or emergency personnel
giving incident to the discharge of
the official duties of such police
officer or firefighter.
>
> (Code 1977, § 9.04.050; Ord.
No. 748-1981, § 4)
>
>
>
>
>
> Sec. 10.20.040. Oversized
commercial vehicles.[permanent link
to this piece of content]
>
> An oversized commercial
vehicle, defined as any vehicle
registered, licensed or used for
commercial purposes or displaying
advertisements for commercial
enterprise and exceeding 18 feet in
length, 18 feet in combined length
for vehicles with trailers, or eight
feet in height, or 8,000 pounds in
weight by the G.V.W. rating
indicated on vehicle, loaded or
unloaded, shall be prohibited from
all zoning districts except with the
following exceptions: I-Industrial.
>
> A.
>
> Oversized commercial vehicles
incidental to a commercial
enterprise shall be permitted on the
premises of such commercial
enterprise in C-C, C-B, C-N, zoning.
>
> B.
>
> Loading or unloading of moving
vans or similar type vehicles used
for moving of personal goods for a
period of 24 hours or less.
>
> C.
>
> Temporary parking for pickup
and delivery purposes for a period
of four hours or less.
>
> D.
>
> Construction equipment and/or
machinery employed in any public
works project in the city parked at
the site of and for the duration of
such construction.
>
> (Code 1977, § 10.20.040; Ord.
No. 748-1981, § 5)
>
>
>
> Chapter 17.20 OFF-STREET
PARKING AND LOADING [1]<http://library.municode.com/HTML/13149/level2/TIT17ZO_CH17.20OREPALO.html#fn_97>
> Sec. 17.20.160. Motor vehicle
parking limitations.[permanent link
to this piece of content]
>
> B. On residential lots, no more
than two motor vehicles may be
parked on any area of the lot other
than within a fully enclosed
structure or on the paved driveway
which is intended for parking or
access to the garage or carport. A
motor vehicle which is parked or
stored on an improved surface
adjacent to a paved driveway, or in
a rear yard, a side yard, or a side
yard adjacent to the street shall be
counted towards the limit of two
such vehicles. No more than one such
motor vehicle may be an inoperable
vehicle as defined in section
8.16.040.D.1 of this Code.
>
________________________________
>
> Sec. 17.20.100. - <http://mail.beaufait.com/edgedesk/cgi-bin/>
Parking<http://mail.beaufait.com/edgedesk/cgi-bin/>
spaces not to be used for storage or
advertising. Required parking spaces
shall be available for the parking
of operable passenger automobiles of
residents, customers, patrons, and
employees only, and shall not be
used for the storage of vehicles or
materials or for the parking of
trucks used in conducting the
business or use, or for the purpose
of advertising.(Code 1977, §
17.20.100; Ord. No. 715-1981, § 15)
>
________________________________
> This is from our Ethics Code
>
> "Open Government & Ethics
Pamphlet 2013
> Other Ethics Rules of Interest
> Page 7
> It also prohibits acts of
advantage or favoritism and, in that
regard, prohibits special
considerations, use of employee time
for personal or private
> reasons, and use of City
vehicles or equipment, except in
same manner as available to any
other person (or in manner that will
substantially benefit City)."
>
________________________________
>
> "Last night we heard from the
owners of the truck. It belongs to a
couple who recently moved to
Louisville and who just purchased
the vehicle. The husband and wife
are a little distressed about why
the selective enforcement against
them. Commander Kingston will speak
with them and convey our assurances
that this is all quite routine and
innocent. "
>
> This quote is from a May 25,
2012 e-mail to me from Bruce
Goodman, Police Chief. He knows the
rules. He applies them when he
wants. He is a bully. He does not do
his job that he is paid to do. He
should be fired on the spot. If he
did his job correctly, the first
time he contacted the owners, he
would not be backed into a corner to
save face. Now, he will not do his
job, just to try to prove he is
correct, when he is so very wrong.
> <dumpster1010b.JPG>
> <dumpster1010a.JPG>
> <dumpster1010.JPG>
|
|
|