October 16, 2013 E-mail From The Mayor About My "Verified Statement" Against Him Stating That He Can No Longer Communicate With Me When He Has Not Been Communicating With Me At All To Fix My Neighborhood Problems As He Believes The Police Chief's Lies.

 From:   Robert Muckle <bobm@Louisvilleco.gov>   

     [ add to contacts ]

 To:  Bev Beaufait <bbeaufa@beaufait.com>
 Date:  Wednesday, October 16, 2013 04:19 pm
 Subject:  Re: 2 More Verified Statements
 Text version of this message. (7KB)

Ms Beaufait:

Because you have filed a complaint against me, I can no longer communicate with you and will have to forward all your emails to our city attorney and the special prosecutor the city will pay to determine the validity of your complaint and what action must be taken. 

Bob Muckle 

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 16, 2013, at 9:37 AM, "Bev Beaufait" <bbeaufa@beaufait.com> wrote:

I turned in a notarized "verified statement" against you and Susan Loo this morning at 9:30 a.m. at our Municipal Court to our Prosecuting Attorney.
You can tell Susan Loo, if you want, as I will not be advising her.
You and she are the worst City Council folks that I have seen, since I moved here in 1988.  You cannot be reasoned with at all, in my humble opinion. 
You and she have done nothing at all to help the Ward II Sundance Park sprinkler problem or the illegal businesses that are allowed to continue in our residential neighborhood to this very day.
I know for a fact that you don't read my e-mails to you.  My legal advice has told me that you keep writing back about addresses.  My pics show street signs.  My pics show actual renter houses, where the violations occur.  I have actually stated the exact address in e-mails to the Police Chief and City Council.
If you read had my e-mails or looked at the URL addy with the pic proofs, you would not be asking me the same question about "the address" for weeks on end.
You let this situation fester, by kicking the can down the road, by having rigid illogical obstruction means to deal with my neighborhood issues .
You could have sent a Ward II rep to check out the illegal Mr. Rooter and Handyman illegal vendor businesses, but you allowed the Police Chief to ignore my proofs, as well as yourself. 
The same can be said about Sundance Park.  You had the nerve to have the City Admin send me an illogical e-mail about how blue grass takes over, as opposed to bindweed. 
The City Admin also stated illogical mathematical facts regarding pop up sprinkler heads buried in the ground over 5 inches in some places, which has never been fixed to this very day and needs fixing by next spring.
My head still hurts from thinking about the illogicalness of his statements. 
The man is horrible confused, in my humble opinion, and has no business being our City Admin!!!!! 
Also, since my proofs showed Dean was not/would not do the job, I proved his lies.  I proved he made payments to vendors, who did not do their work.  You, as our Mayor, waste City $$$$$.
You should have sent a Ward II rep out to check it out...like Susan Loo, my Ward II rep.  Right?  Right. 
You and Susan Loo did neither.
You must realize that your job requires for real proofs.
You chose to believe the lies of the Police Chief instead of me.  It makes me sad, as the "War On Women" continues. 
And, of course, you realize that Bruce will continue his lies to protect himself, while dealing with my "verified statement" against him. 
I wonder what you will do.
Your free will choices.
Bev Beaufait
P.S.  This is a courtesy FYI.  If you do respond to this e-mail, I will have to report that action, as I will consider it, as you trying to bribe me.  I will also consider it harassment; and I will continue to build my case against you and other public servants.  This town is as horrible as Berthoud.  I think Channel 7 news needs to know, again, about Louisville's public corruption, too.

Sec. 9.04.050. Disobeying a lawful order.permanent link to
                                              this piece of content

It is unlawful for any person to knowingly disobey the lawful order of any police officer, firefighter, or emergency personnel giving incident to the discharge of the official duties of such police officer or firefighter.

(Code 1977, § 9.04.050; Ord. No. 748-1981, § 4)


Sec. 10.20.040. Oversized commercial vehicles.permanent link to this
                                            piece of content

An oversized commercial vehicle, defined as any vehicle registered, licensed or used for commercial purposes or displaying advertisements for commercial enterprise and exceeding 18 feet in length, 18 feet in combined length for vehicles with trailers, or eight feet in height, or 8,000 pounds in weight by the G.V.W. rating indicated on vehicle, loaded or unloaded, shall be prohibited from all zoning districts except with the following exceptions: I-Industrial.


Oversized commercial vehicles incidental to a commercial enterprise shall be permitted on the premises of such commercial enterprise in C-C, C-B, C-N, zoning.


Loading or unloading of moving vans or similar type vehicles used for moving of personal goods for a period of 24 hours or less.


Temporary parking for pickup and delivery purposes for a period of four hours or less.


Construction equipment and/or machinery employed in any public works project in the city parked at the site of and for the duration of such construction.

(Code 1977, § 10.20.040; Ord. No. 748-1981, § 5)

Sec. 17.20.160. Motor vehicle parking limitations.permanent link
                                                    to this piece of


B.  On residential lots, no more than two motor vehicles may be parked on any area of the lot other than within a fully enclosed structure or on the paved driveway which is intended for parking or access to the garage or carport. A motor vehicle which is parked or stored on an improved surface adjacent to a paved driveway, or in a rear yard, a side yard, or a side yard adjacent to the street shall be counted towards the limit of two such vehicles. No more than one such motor vehicle may be an inoperable vehicle as defined in section 8.16.040.D.1 of this Code.

Sec. 17.20.100. - Parking spaces not to be used for storage or advertising. Required parking spaces shall be available for the parking of operable passenger automobiles of residents, customers, patrons, and employees only, and shall not be used for the storage of vehicles or materials or for the parking of trucks used in conducting the business or use, or for the purpose of advertising.(Code 1977, § 17.20.100; Ord. No. 715-1981, § 15) 

This is from our Ethics Code

"Open Government & Ethics Pamphlet 2013
Other Ethics Rules of Interest 
Page 7

It also prohibits acts of advantage or favoritism and, in that regard, prohibits special considerations, use of employee time for personal or private 
reasons, and use of City vehicles or equipment, except in same manner as available to any other person (or in manner that will substantially benefit City)."

"Last night we heard from the owners of the truck.  It belongs to a couple who recently moved to Louisville and who just purchased the vehicle.  The husband and wife are a little distressed about why the selective enforcement against them.  Commander Kingston will speak with them and convey our assurances that this is all quite routine and innocent. "

This quote is from a May 25, 2012 e-mail to me from Bruce Goodman, Police Chief.  He knows the rules.  He applies them when he wants.  He is a bully.  He does not do his job that he is paid to do.  He should be fired on the spot.  If he did his job correctly, the first time he contacted the owners, he would not be  backed into a corner to save face.  Now, he will not do his job, just to try to prove he is correct, when he is so very wrong.