|
Day 6.
Still there.
I saw Code Enforcement go
speeding by my house yesterday afternoon, do
a rolling stop at the stop sign, turn left
to go out of the neighborhood, and do
nothing about the renter's illegal
commercial dumpster stored in a residential
neighborhood driveway.
What's up with that?
How's that for public corruption at its
best. Code Enforcement turning a blind
eye. So totally disgusting.
Why are you allowing this to continue to
devalue our neighborhoods?
Why does putting in "verified statements"
do nothing to make City Council and the
Police Department do its job?????
This town is totally corrupt.
The renter parks
the commercial vendor dumpster in the
driveway, like a car. This dumpster
was gone last week. The renter's
commercial vendor truck that pulls his
commercial vendor dumpster needs to be
stored elsewhere, too. Specifically,
where ever it was parked last week, that
is where it needs to stay.
He should not even be
allowed to have his commercial vendor
truck that pulls his commercial vendor
dumpster in our neighborhood, either, as
it is a vendor vehicle, which is against
the law in this residential neighborhood
for operating a commercial vendor
business.
This renter seems to
think, because of favoritism by Code
Enforcement and City Council, that he can
come an go with parking his commercial
vendor truck and his commercial vendor
dumpster any time he wants, since last
May. Disgusting!!!!!!!!
He has no business
coming back to this neighborhood with
his commercial vendor business
equipment, which is against the law in
our City.
Why does not Code
Enforcement just tell the renter the
truth, so this person does not continue
to do this?
Why is Code Enforcement
giving preferential treatment to
renters?
Why is Code Enforcement
letting this renter bring down our
neighborhood values?
Why does not Code
Enforcement tell this renter that this
commercial vendor dumpster of his also
is too large for storage in residential
property, to boot?
Why is this going on and
on?
What is the problem with
Code Enforcement?
What is wrong with City
Council?
Why do you continue to
allow this to happen month after month
after month?
From our Municode
Sec. 17.12.010. District categories.
4. Residential
low density R-L. The
residential low density R-L
district is comprised of
typical urban density
single-family residential
areas.
7. Commercial
neighborhood C-N. The commercial neighborhood
C-N district is comprised of
areas to accommodate mixed
residential and commercial
uses. Uses in this district
shall be strictly reviewed
to ensure compatibility.
8.
Commercial
community C-C. The
commercial community C-C is
a district comprised of
areas to provide for a
restricted range of retail
sales and services including
opportunities for a limited
variety of comparative
shoppers' goods.
9.
Commercial business
C-B. The
commercial business C-B is a
district comprised of areas
to provide for a full range
of retail sales and services
including opportunities for
a complete variety of
comparative shoppers' goods.
Our
neighborhood is number
4. ONLY!!!!
Our
neighborhood is not
numbers 7 -9.
City Council allows Code
Enforcement to break our
residential laws for
favoritism. It is also
against our ethics code for
public servants...you folks.
Here
are the pics from
today for my
proofs.
Updates will come
daily until this
is cleared up.
P.S.
Sec.
9.04.050. Disobeying
a lawful
order.
It is unlawful for any person to knowingly disobey the
lawful order
of any police
officer,
firefighter,
or emergency
personnel
giving
incident to
the discharge
of the
official
duties of such
police officer
or
firefighter.
(Code 1977, § 9.04.050; Ord. No. 748-1981, § 4)
Sec.
10.20.040. Oversized
commercial
vehicles.
An
oversized
commercial
vehicle,
defined as any
vehicle
registered,
licensed or
used for
commercial
purposes or
displaying
advertisements
for commercial
enterprise and
exceeding 18
feet in
length, 18
feet in
combined
length for
vehicles with
trailers, or
eight feet in
height, or
8,000 pounds
in weight by
the G.V.W.
rating
indicated on
vehicle,
loaded or
unloaded,
shall be
prohibited
from all
zoning
districts
except with
the following
exceptions:
I-Industrial.
Oversized
commercial
vehicles
incidental to
a commercial
enterprise
shall be
permitted on
the premises
of such
commercial
enterprise in
C-C, C-B, C-N,
zoning.
Loading
or unloading
of moving vans
or similar
type vehicles
used for
moving of
personal goods
for a period
of 24 hours or
less.
Temporary
parking for
pickup and
delivery
purposes for a
period of four
hours or less.
Construction
equipment
and/or
machinery
employed in
any public
works project
in the city
parked at the
site of and
for the
duration of
such
construction.
(Code
1977, §
10.20.040;
Ord. No.
748-1981, § 5)
Chapter
17.20 OFF-STREET
PARKING AND
LOADING [1]
Sec.
17.20.160. Motor
vehicle
parking
limitations.
B. On residential lots,
no more than
two motor
vehicles may
be parked on
any area of
the lot other
than within a
fully enclosed
structure or
on the paved
driveway which
is intended
for parking or
access to the
garage or
carport. A
motor vehicle
which is
parked or
stored on an
improved
surface
adjacent to a
paved
driveway, or
in a rear
yard, a side
yard, or a
side yard
adjacent to
the street
shall be
counted
towards the
limit of two
such vehicles.
No more than
one such motor
vehicle may be
an inoperable
vehicle as
defined in
section
8.16.040.D.1
of this Code.
Sec.
17.20.100. - Parking spaces
not to be used
for storage or
advertising. Required parking spaces
shall be
available for
the parking of
operable
passenger
automobiles of
residents,
customers,
patrons, and
employees
only, and
shall not be
used for the
storage of
vehicles or
materials or
for the parking of
trucks used in
conducting the
business or
use, or for
the purpose of
advertising.(Code
1977, §
17.20.100;
Ord. No.
715-1981, §
15)
This
is from our
Ethics Code
"Open
Government
& Ethics
Pamphlet 2013
Other Ethics
Rules of
Interest
Page 7
It also
prohibits acts
of advantage
or favoritism
and, in that
regard,
prohibits
special
considerations,
use of
employee time
for personal
or private
reasons,
and use of
City vehicles
or equipment,
except in same
manner as
available to
any other
person (or in
manner that
will
substantially
benefit
City)."
"Last night we heard from the owners of the truck.
It belongs to
a couple who
recently moved
to Louisville
and who just
purchased the
vehicle.
The husband
and wife are a
little
distressed
about why the
selective
enforcement
against
them.
Commander
Kingston will
speak with
them and
convey our
assurances
that this is
all quite
routine and
innocent. "
This
quote is from
a May 25, 2012
e-mail to me
from Bruce
Goodman,
Police
Chief.
He knows the
rules.
He applies
them when he
wants.
He is a
bully.
He does not do
his job that
he is paid to
do. He
should be
fired on the
spot. If
he did his job
correctly, the
first time he
contacted the
owners, he
would not
be
backed into a
corner to save
face.
Now, he will
not do his
job, just to
try to prove
he is correct,
when he is so
very wrong.
409 W. Sycamore Court.
|
Text version of this
message. (7KB) 
dumpster1106a.JPG (128KB)